Home - William J. Olson, P.C., Attorneys At Law

Your learned and wise counsel was crucial to the success we had.... I consider you both true friends and loyal patriots to the true cause of liberty in our Country."
Alabama Chief Justice Roy S. Moore

"Your creativity in getting constitutional issues raised before the U.S. District Court was
instrumental in the favorable outcome that we enjoyed when the Government came after us."
Bernard von NotHaus, The Liberty Dollar

"You were there for us when the FTC came after us. Yours is one of the few law firms that really understands the nature of the threat posed to alternative medicine by Big Pharma and its friends in government. You worked very hard for us, showing they really cared for our welfare as well as the issues, and wrote many powerful legal briefs in our defense including an amicus to the Supreme Court. What we will always cherish most is, you prayed with us!"
Jim & Tricia Feijo, Daniel Chapter One

"They always say, 'Don't fight the Fed.' But you did fight them for us and beat them and recovered our attorneys' fees as well. How many other lawyers have done that? Not many. Few have the talent and fewer still the courage."
Chris Powell, Secretary-Treasurer, Gold Anti-trust Action Committee (GATA)

"In the many years since I was court-martialed for disobeying an unlawful order to serve the United Nations under a foreign officer, you have never abandoned me or my cause."
Michael New

"The principled positions that you advanced to the U.S. Supreme Court in your
brief were invaluable in obtaining our victory in Heller v. District of Columbia."
Dick Heller

"Thank you for your eloquent, fearless defense of our country."
Jane M. Orient, M.D., Executive Director, Association of American Physicians and Surgeons

"Your dogged persistence before the U.S. Court of Federal Claims saved
my Navy benefits allowing me to serve God and provide for my family"
David Alan Carmichael, Freedom Ministries

"May God bless your tireless efforts on behalf of freedom-loving people everywhere"
J. Mark Brewer, Brewer & Pritchard, Houston, Texas

"I continue to read each of your briefs, and want you to know that
you are doing outstanding work. I offer my strong congratulations."
William F. Harvey, Dean Emeritus, Indiana University School of Law

"Paul and I can’t thank you enough for your excellent and successful work as part of our federal criminal defense team. Your firm’s technical legal challenges to the indictment no doubt forced the government to reconsider its case and drop six of the eight counts against us. And Rob’s four trips to Houston, courtesy of Gun Owners of America, helped us get ready for trial. Your firm’s knowledge and experience with federal gun law was invaluable, and eventually the jury acquitted us of the two remaining charges against us. When the judge read the “not guilty” verdicts, it was a wonderful day for us all."
Robert G. Arwady, Houston, Texas

"I have worked with your firm on firearms cases for more than a decade, and it is always a pleasure. Most recently, your work was very helpful to me in my role as defense counsel in a federal criminal trial. Your firm’s extensive work with federal gun laws helped fashion some creative arguments that really helped us win the case."
Robert Sanders, Esquire, Winston-Salem, NC
(former Assistant Director for Criminal Enforcement, BATF).

"Your amicus work is outstanding, and I strongly congratulate you. Rather often wonder if there is any law left these days. Your briefs encourage me to believe there is, and I hope you can often continue with them."
William F. Harvey, Dean Emeritus, Indiana University School of Law

Trump v. Slaughter — Amicus Brief

ddavies September 15, 2025 Constitutional Law, U. S. Supreme Court

Link to brief

Law Matters — Episode 27

ddavies September 11, 2025 Appearances, Constitutional Law

Attorneys Alicia Kutzer and Bill Olson discuss our Amicus brief at the U.S. Supreme Court in RICELS v. Noem on the Constitution’s Separation of Powers doctrine and the scope of a President’s executive power to design and implement national immigration policies.

Link to podcast

Refugee & Immigrant Center for Education & Legal Services v. Noem — Amicus Brief

ddavies August 29, 2025 Constitutional Law, U. S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Link to brief

For a discussion of this case, see Law Matters Episode 27.

First Choice Women’s Resource Centers v. Platkin — Amicus Brief

ddavies August 28, 2025 Constitutional Law, U. S. Supreme Court

Link to brief

National Religious Broadcasters v. IRS — Amicus Brief

ddavies August 11, 2025 Constitutional Law, U. S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas

Link to brief

Case v. Montana — Amicus Brief

ddavies August 6, 2025 Constitutional Law, U. S. Supreme Court

Link to brief

Noem v. Al Otro Lado — Amicus Brief

ddavies July 31, 2025 Constitutional Law, Executive Orders, Statutory Construction, U. S. Supreme Court

Link to brief

Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections — Amicus Brief

ddavies July 29, 2025 Election Law, U. S. Supreme Court

Link to brief

Link to prior amicus brief in this case

United States v. Russell — Amicus Brief

ddavies July 21, 2025 Constitutional Law, U. S. District Court, District of Maryland

Link to brief

Steve Gruber Show Interview

ddavies July 18, 2025 Appearances, Constitutional Law

Bill Olson interview discussing our 8-0 winning record on amicus briefs filed with the Supreme Court on Trump Administration Motions for Stay.

Link to interview

Curling v. Worley — Amicus Brief

ddavies July 16, 2025 Election Law, U. S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Link to brief

Law Matters — Episode 26

ddavies July 10, 2025 Appearances, Constitutional Law

Attorneys Alicia Kutzer and Bill Olson discuss our U.S. Supreme Court amicus brief in McMahon v. State of New York, where we supported the Trump Administration’s application to stay a district court injunction of the Administration’s efforts to downsize the U.S. Department of Education.

Link to podcast

Refugee and Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services v. Noem — Amicus Brief

ddavies July 9, 2025 Constitutional Law, U. S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Link to brief

Law Matters — Episode 25

ddavies July 3, 2025 Appearances

Attorneys Alicia Kutzer and Bill Olson discuss our U.S. Supreme Court amicus brief in Noem v Doe, where we supported the Trump Administration’s application to stay a district court injunction of the Administration’s termination of parole processes for 532,000 Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans.

Link to podcast

NRA v. Glass — Amicus Brief

ddavies June 20, 2025 Firearms Law, U. S. Supreme Court

Link to brief

McMahon v. State of New York — Amicus Brief

ddavies June 16, 2025 Constitutional Law, U. S. Supreme Court

Link to brief

For a discussion of this case, see Law Matters Episode 26

Previous amicus brief in this case

For a discussion of this case, see Law Matters Episode 25.

Page 1 of 43
1
2
3
...
43
→

Trump v. Slaughter — Amicus Brief

Law Matters — Episode 27

Refugee & Immigrant Center for Education & Legal Services v. Noem — Amicus Brief

First Choice Women’s Resource Centers v. Platkin — Amicus Brief

National Religious Broadcasters v. IRS — Amicus Brief

Case v. Montana — Amicus Brief

Noem v. Al Otro Lado — Amicus Brief

Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections — Amicus Brief

United States v. Russell — Amicus Brief

Steve Gruber Show Interview

Curling v. Worley — Amicus Brief

Law Matters — Episode 26

Refugee and Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services v. Noem — Amicus Brief

Law Matters — Episode 25

NRA v. Glass — Amicus Brief

McMahon v. State of New York — Amicus Brief

Chiles v. Salazar — Amicus Brief

Trump v. American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO

U.S. Department of Homeland Security v. D.V.D. — Amicus Brief

United States v. Brown — Amicus Brief

New Hampshire Indonesian Community Support v. Trump — Amicus Brief

Planned Parenthood of Greater NY v. U.S. Dept. of HHS — Amicus Brief

Fyk v. Facebook — Amicus Brief

Comments to Federal Trade Commission — Big Tech Censorship

Noem v. Doe — Amicus Brief